INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH International Peer Reviewed & Refereed Journals, Open Access Journal ISSN Approved Journal No: 2455-2631 | Impact factor: 8.15 | ESTD Year: 2016
open access , Peer-reviewed, and Refereed Journals, Impact factor 8.15
ADMINISTRATIVE QUALITY, UNBIAS PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL EXERCISE AND STAFF JOB SATISFACTION
Authors Name:
Anho Joseph Efe
, Enamuotor Jane Ovoke
Unique Id:
IJSDR2306098
Published In:
Volume 8 Issue 6, June-2023
Abstract:
This paper discusses administrative quality, un-bias performance appraisal exercises and staff job performance. Performance appraisal is the evaluation of the contribution of employee towards the attainment of the organizational goals and objectives. It is the systematic rating, examination, evaluation and description of employees performance on how they have done or doing their jobs – its purpose is to look at employee strength and weaknesses, to identify the training needs, to review work schedules in the right direction, it provides employees the opportunities to realize their potentials, helps to provide information for modifying job schedules for personnel planning, promotion, recruitment and selection of staff. The paper identified some features of a good appraisal to include; being objective, impartial, acceptable and factual, it must have good job schedule description on the expectation of the employee and the users must have adequate training on appraisal. Appraisal exercise is done by self, subordinates, peers, superiors or the combination of any of the above. Staff appraisal creates and sustain teachers satisfaction in their job and triggers higher performance, brings greater productivity greater and better versa-ability and adaptability to new methods, with job satisfaction which lowers labour turnover and less absenteeism. The paper also identified some challenges against quality and unbiased appraisal exercise; to include not stating clearly the purposes of appraisal, unfair evaluation when staff appraises themselves, high cost in terms of time money and efforts invested in it. It is often wrongly used by heads/managers/employers and students who are not trained in the use of the various rating scales. Some relevant recommendations offered include; making appraisal to be objectives, impartial, acceptable and functional, must have good description on job expectation, and have adequate and relevant training on staff appraisal exercise.
Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn