Welcome to IJSDR UGC CARE norms ugc approved journal norms IJRTI Research Journal | ISSN : 2455-2631
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH International Peer Reviewed & Refereed Journals, Open Access Journal ISSN Approved Journal No: 2455-2631 | Impact factor: 8.15 | ESTD Year: 2016
Scholarly open access journals, Peer-reviewed, and Refereed Journals, Impact factor 8.15 (Calculate by google scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool) , Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Indexing in all major database & Metadata, Citation Generator, Digital Object Identifier(DOI)
Immediate effect of Maitland Mobilization versus Muscle Energy Technique on Non-specific neck pain associated with forward head posture in auto drivers
Authors Name:
Dr. Sunidhi Surendra Shinde
, Dr. Shradha Nagmode , Dr. Virendra Meshram
Unique Id:
IJSDR2305213
Published In:
Volume 8 Issue 5, May-2023
Abstract:
ABSTRACT Objective: Immediate effect of Maitland Mobilization versus Muscle Energy Technique on non-specific neck pain associated with forward head posture in auto drivers. Design: Simple Random Sampling. Methodology: A total 45 patients were included as per pre define inclusion and exclusion criteria and randomly assigned into two groups each having 20 patients. Group A was given Maitland Mobilization (Anteroposterior and Posteroanterior Glide) while Group B was given Muscle Energy Technique (Sub occipital Muscle Release) for once. The patient’ outcome measures were assessed by visual analog scale and measurement of craniovertebral angle with ON Protractor smartphone application. Pre and Post treatment values were recorded for comparison of results. Results: Results revealed that means and S.D of both group were clinically significant but statically the group of the patients treated with Group A MM managed pain CVA (pre= 45.66 ± 3.72, post= 45.66 ± 3.72), VAS ( pre= 6.75 ± 1.29, post= 2.45 ± 1.92) is better than group B of patient treated with Muscle Energy Technique in terms of pain. On CVA (pre= 47.09 ± 1.66, post= 49.48 ± 1.44) on VAS (pre= 6.4 ± 1.31, post= 4.7 ± 1.21). Conclusion: The result of study suggest that both the Maitland Mobilization and Muscle Energy Technique improves the symptoms of neck pain. Better improvement was shown by Maitland Mobilization group than Muscle Energy Technique group. Based on these results Maitland mobilization should be the treatment choice for non-specific neck pain associated with forward head posture.
Keywords:
Non- specific neck pain, Forward head posture, Maitland Mobilization, Muscle energy technique.
Cite Article:
"Immediate effect of Maitland Mobilization versus Muscle Energy Technique on Non-specific neck pain associated with forward head posture in auto drivers ", International Journal of Science & Engineering Development Research (www.ijsdr.org), ISSN:2455-2631, Vol.8, Issue 5, page no.1330 - 1341, May-2023, Available :http://www.ijsdr.org/papers/IJSDR2305213.pdf
Downloads:
000222060
Publication Details:
Published Paper ID: IJSDR2305213
Registration ID:205852
Published In: Volume 8 Issue 5, May-2023
DOI (Digital Object Identifier):
Page No: 1330 - 1341
Publisher: IJSDR | www.ijsdr.org
ISSN Number: 2455-2631
Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn